until Dru Ditsch
| Published
That’s a real man, and here again for the giant Frekin’s giant robot about another famous failure of the film.
We are watching one of the failures of my favorite film, a film I’ve already focused on. Weekly podcast of Club Film, Genrevision.
The continuation of the scientific-fancies/scary, which was rejected by critics and quickly abandoned by the audience because it was undeniable to be less than the award-winning masterpiece before him.
And thankfully, there was no other film made in its franchise in the part of the reception of this investigation.
climb with me and into the telepoo when I’m investigating why why ii fly iI failed.
the fly II Origins
In 1957, as a short story of George Lanjilan, fly It was first translated into a long and successful film in
But in 1986, the Canadian genre teacher David Cronberg recreated recreated fly And his version became a fugitive song, not only with the audience but also in a critical way.
And it didn’t last long for Cronberg. fly To be seen as a real classic.
Naturally behind the manufacturers fly He wanted to take advantage of the success of the film. It is always nice to note that one of these producers was a comedy icon, Mel Brusks.
Chris Wallace, the influential artist who led his production on the rebuilding of Cronberg, eventually ended on the director’s chair. ii fly iI.
Walas deliberately wanted the drag of the film to be more a direct monster film, unlike the opera tragedy of Kronberg’s opera.
In some ways, this reflects the investigations of less and less welcomed the original film of 1958, the fly return and damn the flies.
As far as the public was related to public opinion, it was likely to be equal to the extensively accepted quality of the film.
so, ii fly iI Previously, he competed with many barriers of bakeries before being a film: the less perceived nature of investigations, before it could not live at all, and an artistic way to highlight how different this article is from the previous film.
II flies story
Story ii fly iI Arts around Martin Brundel, the children of the heroes, Sess Brondell and Veronica Quiff will meet in the first film.
Martin will meet in a laboratory at Bartok Indestreyz, the company that provided the telepus of Cess Brondel’s tests.
Martin is rapidly due to his DNA deterioration, but he has a nursing mind and tries to solve the problem of his genetic destiny.
Naturally, he eventually turns into a surprising flying monster before everything is said and done.
General-exterior effect will grow
Without combing in every part of the plot or revising you ii fly iI – What is that? Genrevision ring is there for – Enough, to say, ii fly iI One of the expectations of people to follow up fly: The effects of Goopy, Gross-Out.
But while Cronberg’s film was singing the effects of a catastrophic and deliberate tone, ii fly iI He tries to spend more happiness with his effects.
And the boy never allows us to lose an unbelievable Martinfly doll along the film’s top, gives us one of the biggest headscarves on the cinema, and has created the best vertebrae in a way that has been placed on the film so far.
But it is not difficult to know why this approach is more celebrating the blood and beasts of Bonanza.
meanwhile ii fly iI‘s Tone is definitely less than its background, the story doesn’t get the urine out of itself. The characters and the story are all treated with real emotional weight, and that could lead to a little disagreement for the audience when things were happier.
Cronberg’s film treated him with the utmost loyalty in an attempt to bother and people were depressed. Chris Wallace has the same level of loyalty in his path with his effects ii fly iIbut it is not the same emotional goal as Cronberg.
At the end of the story, Martin is our direct hero, which makes his peak’s summit closer to a supersty story closer to the tragic romance of the first film.
And I’m ready to bet on that this didn’t click with the expectations. fly.
the dog dies and much worse
now, ii fly iI It really has a very dark and depressed element for his story that fits more with the emotional expectations of the first film, but that’s the worst type of pluta you can do when you talk about viewers who like your film.
Martin is accompanied by one of the dogs of testing in the laboratory, but he witnesses what is used in the Telepod test. It turns into a hidden and painful creature called killed.
But that’s a lie and Martin finds that his dog’s friend is kept alive. This causes Martin to kill the dog on the screen. In a moment I bet on money on leaving someone in the theater in protest.
Again, what can you hear that I’m thinking about all this for the film in general genrevisionbut let’s explain that dogs who die in movies are a negative sign against movies for a small number of movie audiences.
And if you kill a dog in a movie and don’t treat it in a way that most people feel completely true, it seems to hurt your film significantly.
Add for ii fly iI‘s The problem that has anchored with young actors who didn’t have a big tile with the audience. I talked about the same issue on the same issue the the rule of fire video and ii fly iI It has the same burden.
But unlike most of the films we are talking about for this series, ii fly iI In fact, it was opened in the number one box office. It will eventually receive $12.5 million, $20 million from domestic boxes and about $19 million in international markets.
So, where does the “failed” section come in?
Fly II killed this fan
good, ii fly iI It was cut off by most critics to the tapes and the public opinion about the film was stuck. It was another prolonged growth, but things separated from each other due to poor absorption. ii fly iI Another follow-up is very dangerous.
And that bad reception eventually brought a cloud to any other profit of the frankness in the film form. However, continuity of comic book in ii fly iI‘s Story, no other film project has been revealed to this property.
so, effectively, effectively, ii fly iI he killed any other person fly Movies to more attention.
i’m not saying it should be more fly The films, but during the IP era, seeing a franchise of a film is actually a very rare investigation and a layer of thought is needed. Mish II.
Only it is to show that money is not a criterion for the success of pop culture… Although I always love Martinopley, but it seems to stay a little in the eyes of most people because he is not just like his father.
Source link
