Following a recent conflict between Israel and Iran, Egiger CEO Brandon Daniels is considering weaknesses of the supply chain and needs to be done to make it more confident.
Historical Iran strikes It has revealed more than only American power on the world stage – they also exposed the potential weak points of the defense industry in its supply chain.
Executive Director of Exieger, Brandon Daniels, believes that if America can rethink how it approaches its defense supply chain, it can turn from high vulnerability into the largest US asset.
“There are a few critical things we have seen in our data and we are starting to appear because our AI has been considering potential influences. One is that there is a widespread impact on Israeli technology addictions,” Daniels told Fox Business.

US Air Force Bombs Bo-2 Stealth Stealth is covered by four F-22 Raptor fighter jets during the flight of military aircraft along the Hudson River and the news port beside Newouge and Newu Jerseyers on July 4, 2020. (Reuters / Mike Fresh / Reuters)
Rand Paul wonders whether Trump’s Iran attack is a good idea: “Critics love it”
Exieger has discovered that more than 28,000 US -based companies depend on technology made, updated or maintained in Israel. As the Israelis began to conclude during the conflict with Iran, it puts the work of those companies in danger. Daniels emphasized that when they look at the line of companies that are further removed from the conflict, the number of affected companies goes to about 13.7 million.
Daniels told Fox Business that Egiger had found an “explosion” of addictions to technology coming from the Middle East, especially when it comes to computer security. He noted that Israel is one of the largest security software manufacturers in the world, which means US companies are more vulnerable when Israel is in times of war or conflict.
If the conflict with Iran had escalated into “full kinetic expansion”, it would “ask us to ramp and change and redesign our supply chains to support. Systems like B-2who have several demands regarding critical minerals and magnets, “Daniels said.

Map of US strikes in Iran on June 21, 2025. (Fox / Fox news)
“We have to move faster to turn our supply chain into weapons itself. Because being able to act quickly and fast procurement is a differentiator when it comes to the military struggle,” Daniels told Fox Business.
While these weaknesses became obvious during the Israeli war with Hamas, which began in October 2023 and is still ongoing, Daniels explained that they were more pronounced during the conflict with Iran.
“When you have two main nations such as Israel and Iran in a full kinetic war, you will have more deteriorating and more pronounced potential exclusions … It is now much more pronounced than when it was when Israel took Hezbollah or Israel.
Daniels warns that it’s time to stop thinking about supply chains for six days or weeks out and start thinking about them six months to six years out to have maximum protection. Although he believes Congress is likely to focus More about the visibility of the supply chain in the National Defense Authority (NDAA) for FY2026.
“I would have guessed – and from what I see, from what has been announced or the talks I have – this year’s NDA will understand this issue of visibility of the supply chain very seriously about the department and the performers who support the department,” Daniels told Fox Business.

Multiple spirits B-2 land for renewal of aircraft as clouds of storms are collected on August 24, 2016 at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam. (Picture Group / Universal Images through Getty Images / Getty Images)
Get the fox business on the go by clicking here
To the question of what is needed to build elastic Chain of Supply from Defense In 2025, Daniels stressed the need for mapping and chain account. This would mean a complete understanding of where the parts are produced, which produces them and what falls into the doing.
In addition, suppliers need to be integrated “into an engagement platform” that will enable more open communication and strategy. He also added that rationalization or eliminating unnecessary regulatory standards would allow the United States and its allies to return more from the production process.
Source link