until Dru Ditsch
| Published
My philosophy with imagination is that every story is a terrible story until it is not. Throughness as a genre is often misunderstood or openly criticized by analysts who do not actually respect it. Why do you still hear the debate of insignificant about “Is Is the silence of the lambs a horror movie? is Jasus A terrible movie?” When such examples always end with the same answer from anyone who understands the story.
This view has made me see the stories as a terrible that others may not see. It is from the point of view that my thesis is ridiculous in the headline: to kill a joke bird It is a terrible story. More for the purpose of my private argument, to kill a joke bird It’s a terrible movie.
let’s talk about black horror
I recently revised a review of one of the documentaries of my favorite films. Nuer’s horror: A terrible history of blacks. You can read that review hereBut the reason for this is one of the most important documentaries I have watched when it talks about giving me a very necessary view of criticism and artistic analysis. As the film shows, “Black History is a Black Black”, it was the same comment I thought of thinking. to kill a joke bird as a horror movie.
Story to kill a joke bird Finally, around the trial of Tom Robinson, a black man accused of raping a white woman. As in both Harper Lee and Robert Muligan, we know that Tom is innocent. However, he is guilty of racial criticism and when he tries to escape, he is shot and killed.
However, IMDB has genres such as “legal drama” and “drama’s drama” on its page for to kill a joke birdI see nothing but horror in describing an innocent black man whose railways are put into an unjust decision. There is even a cold scene where Acts Finch, the ethics center of the story, must guard Tom at night for fear of killing the city’s people before his trial.
But, I’ll be completely honest with you and say that the terrible part of the black part to kill a joke bird It is not my strongest argument for the horror movies. No, I have all the explosives I need thank you for Radley.
the monster next to the door
the main factor in the story to kill a joke bird Arthur’s unwanted character “Bbu” Radley, the neighbor of the champion of the Finch. He was treated as a local monster that no one never sees. Naturally, it was used as a metaphor to understand someone else because they are different from you. It is a classic way to premature discussion in both gender frameworks and a broader humanist style.
But, a terrible and classic element in to kill a joke bird Since the people we believe are monstrouss are not real evil. Bob Ewell, the drunk racist who is the real guilty of rape, eventually attacks Skaut and his brother, Jem. And who must be the one who saves them? Why, that’s the monster next to you, it was Radley.
I feel like Gillermo Del Toro will be the only modern director who can rebuild to kill a joke bird And emphasize his horror film elements so that the audience “receives them. in many ways, to kill a joke bird It is also a story of Noire because the genre tells the story of the darkness of darkness in the heart of the so-called civilized society. I’m watching nightmare street and think about it, “Yes, i want him with him to kill a joke bird‘ “
horror, not drama
I hate the genre of “Drama” because it is not a genre. Drama is a natural motivation behind the construction of narrative art. “Drama” is the only way to tell you that there will be a movie about the talk of ordinary people in the rooms. Instead of giving him the libal of the drama unconscious, to kill a joke bird It should be embraced as a terrible and historic film about the monsters we are still treating to this day.
I love to kill a joke bird Like a novel and more as a film. So, I will continue to name a horror movie because it is one.
Source link
