We are only three months to 2025, but we don’t feel soon to choose the worst fantasy flick in the year. The Asstronaut, which was screened for the first time on Friday, was disappointed and confused. Kate Mara, Llorina Fishborn and Gabriel Luna are all great actors, but they cannot save a scenario that refuses to go anywhere interesting or say something meaningful.
The film tells the story of an astronaut named Sam Waker (Kit Mara), which he has withdrawn all on his first flight to space. NASA believes something has been dissolved in its space when it descends to Earth, so they keep it in an isolated home in Virginia as they know. What comes after a honey movie drawn, which gradually keeps surrounded around the surface. If you hate the fear of jumping, a hard luck: it’s just a second action of this film he offers.
Like all the worst heroes in the narrative of a ghost house, the Waker takes forever to find a situation that the audience has found in the first few minutes. Yes, there is an explanation in the movie why he is very hesitant to take the threat seriously or 90% of the normal things that the real person does in this situation, but that does not cause less annoying silence to look.
in Question and Answers SectionGabriel Luna (which plays the role of Sam’s spouse Mark) briefly summarized Sam’s character, saying, “In any terrible image, you are like ‘this stupid person. Why are you doing this?’ But he is a smuggler and you can believe that I love Gabriel, but I don’t have any ideas here.
The sky is a slap, accepted and bad corruption that moves the landing.
The film is the first director to direct director Jess Varly, and there are many small moments that give it. The first act contains a lot of apparently random and injections, and has visual taste that seems to be simply because the director thought they were cool. In the end, there is a series of a series of cosmetics. Restaurant Series “Jurassic Park”but with any of the joys of hiding and searching that brought a series with him. In The Asstronaut, there is a range that goes back to better fictional scientific films such as “ET” and “Close Encounters,” which only reminds us of how flawed this film is.
Where the asstronaut leaves the ball the most, it is with the final act, which reveals that the film will be accumulated for a large, stupid and unconvinorable twist. Worst of all, the film doesn’t really apply to all the ethical questions that are accompanied by twist. The role of Fishborn’s character feels half-cooked, as well as the answers of all other characters to the revelation. For all the painful meeting it has achieved, it is rapidly for the big revelation.
I think a lot of things would have been better if the visual effects were stronger, but they weren’t them. Many of the films that are inspired by The Astronaut, more than thirty years, forty years ago, came out, and Imaginary scientific things are much better in these movies He does it here in the Mam. I have sympathy because “this heaven” is not a large budget block, and in the questioning and answers, the inventors were fully about the lack of a large budget, but the Sci-Fi VFX appeared only very stupid. The final act wants to attract the darkness of your heart, but it is very simply without sauce to pull the disaster out.
Source link
