Unlock the editor’s digestion for free
Rula Calaf, FT editor, chooses his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
Irrigation of changes in government welfare will cost taxpayers of £ 2.5 billion, he admitted that Secretary of Work and Pensions Liz Kendall admitted on Monday, as official estimates showed that revised measures would still push 150,000 people into poverty.
Setting the details of the concessions offered to labor lawmakers to prevent them from passing the law – including stricter criteria for eligibility for the benefits of disability, will only apply to new applicants – Kendall acknowledged that the initial pace of change was too fast.
“There was also real concern … We listened carefully and made positive changes as a result,” she told the lower house.
But she defended the attempt to deal with Britain’s spiral welfare budget to make it “sustainable” for future generations.
Talks are still ongoing between lashes and labor lawmakers, although further concessions before Tuesday’s vote are unlikely, according to people informed about discussions.
The ministers were ready for a rebellion of 126 lawmakers, who are now expected to be reduced to about 50 – not enough to overcome the majority of the government.
On Monday night, labor lawmakers set aside another reasoned amendment designed to kill the law, which quickly collected 38 signatures from labor lawmakers and a small number of other party members.
Rachel Maskel, a lawmaker for Yorkyor Central, said the amendment was elected on behalf of the deaf and organizations of people with disabilities, “to give them a vote in this debate because their agency has not been heard”.
Asked if he thinks the amendment is possible to attract the votes of 83 labor lawmakers, probably necessary to beat the government, Maskel said: “I think we are approaching and more thinking. Even the loyal lawmakers who were supposed to vote (government reforms) are thinking of refraining.”
Many lawmakers are not expected to decide until the vote at around 7pm tomorrow, setting a potentially frantic lobbying day between opposing camps within the paper.
Conservatives said they would vote against the law, although Tory’s leader, Kemi Badenoch, described the well -being budget as “out of control”.
Ministers are still expecting View the biggest rebellion From the Starmer Premier League, tightening the 16s who opposed the Law on Planning and Infrastructure earlier this month.
Tony Blair’s biggest uprising in his first year included 47 Bankers, according to Philip Kauli, a professor of politics at Quinn Mary University.
Some labor lawmakers have also remained very critical. Marie Tidbol, a MP for Peniston and Stoxbridge and a disability rights campaign, complained that people who were most affected were not properly consulted for reforms.
“Having no public consultation on these plans excludes the votes of people with disabilities. This worsens the disability,” she said.
Modeling by the Department of Work and Pensions released on Monday has shown that about 150,000 people will still be imposed in poverty by 2030 due to planned well -being reductions – compared to 250,000 according to initial proposals.
However, modeling did not include “potentially positive influence” of additional funding and measures to support people with disabilities at work.
Some lawmakers have welcomed Starmer’s concessions, but critics say they risk creating a “two -stage” well -being where people who become disabled after reforms could lose.
Shadow Secretary and Pensions, Helen Willie, told Commons that changes mean that “two people diagnosed with Parkinson a week will now receive different levels of support”.
The new details have emerged along with a written statement by Sir Steven Tims, Minister of Disability, determining the conditions for references for a comprehensive review of the payment of personal independence or Pip, which will not be completed until the new changes arise.
Sarah Owen, chairman of the Labor Committee for the Women’s and Equalities of Commons, said there was no “logic” of time, which he warned would lead to even more differences in the system.
Labor officials have admitted that lawmakers should be “confident” at that moment and suggest that the recommendations given by the Tims panel can be applied retrospectively.
Downing Street said he was convinced that creating a two -stage benefit system for new and existing applicants was legal. Kendall said it is common for existing applicants to be kept in old measures for prosperity once they are reformed.
Some people still receive a “serious disabling compensation” that was abolished in 2001, while many others are on a disability allowance, which was replaced by PIP in 2013, she said.
The prime minister argues that reforms are essential to stop the budget for increasing well-being, but changes will reduce savings for the government by nearly £ 5 billion to about £ 2 billion-2.5 billion pounds.
Combined with the previous turn of paying winter fuel for retirees, Chancellor Rachel Reeves is left with a hole in her budget of nearly £ 4 billion that may need to raise taxes.
Changing the right text of the Law on Welfare at this stage is not possible, so lawmakers are required to take the Ministry’s statement as promise that changes will be made later.
Source link
