Unlock the editor’s digestion for free
Rula Calaf, FT editor, chooses his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
The UK government is facing a vote on its controversial reforms in well -being, with ministers refusing to say whether their concessions will be sufficient to prevent the riot from labor lawmakers.
Health Street Wes Street said the government on Sunday is “in a better position” after Watering down His disability in the benefits of reforms, but did not stop saying he was confident he had the numbers after more than 120 labor lawmakers threatened to rebel.
The government has a majority of community working home, which means that about 80 labor lawmakers will probably have to vote against its Welfare Law to defeat it, depending on the abstained and assuming other parties oppose it.
“We are in a much better position than we were last week,” Street told the BBC, but he admitted that there is still “much confidence to build”.
Community voting on Welfare Law on Tuesday has become a key test for Prime Minister Sir Kir Starmer As he approaches the first anniversary of his time.
Starmer moved to mitigate reforms in well -being last week, after the government seemed to lose voting despite the large majority.
Government changes in law-incurrent and promise that they will not benefit the benefits of disability, called personal payments for independence, from the people they are already receiving-have been considered an important turnaround by the prime minister.
Critics say concessions risk creating a “two -stage” well -being where people who become disabled after reforms may lose.
Starmer argues that reforms are essential to stop the budget for higher spiral, but changes will reduce savings for the government by nearly £ 5 billion to about £ 2 billion.
Combined with a previous twist in the promotion of winter fuel for pensioners, Chancellor Rachel Reeves is left with A. DUP of 4.25 billion pounds in her budget.
The finance ministry said the hole would not be filled with “permanent” borrowing and would determine how it would be funded in the autumn budget, which encourages critics to warn Reeves, will need to raise taxes.
A large number of rebels in the paper have said they are now ready to support the welfare account, but dozens are considered to stick out, with many taking the weekend to think about their options.
A Downing Street spokesman declined to say whether the government is “quietly convinced” for winning the vote when asked, but stressed how many leading rebels agreed to support the government after the concessions.
They said the image would become clearer on Monday, after ministers set the conditions for reference to review personal payments for independence by Sir Steven Tims, Social Security Minister and Disability.
But being so close to a key government’s vote without a clearer picture of the outcome is unusual and highlights tensions within the labor.
The government official said they had “good talks” with lawmakers about changes in the law.
“Timms’ review will ensure that we protect the most vulnerable, we will get those who want to work back in work and maintain a sustainable well -being for the future,” they added. “This is important for all Labor MPs.”
Tims review of the process of assessment of personal independence payments will contribute from people with disabilities, relevant charity and lawmakers.
The government will also introduce the “right to rehearsal” legislation, which means that people coming out of disability benefits to start a new job will not automatically lose state support. This will handle the circumstances when work fails.
On Monday, the Secretary of Work and Pensions, Liz Kendall, is due to make a statement to Commons in which the planned amendments to the Government in prosperity reforms are made.
Changing the right text of the Law on Welfare at this stage is not possible, so lawmakers are required to take the Ministry’s statement as promise that changes will be made later.
Paula Barker, a lawmaker for Liverpool Waywertre, who helped organize the rebellion against the law, said that although she was “undoubtedly”, many opponents got the government “there are still many who will still vote against”.
“Some colleagues are waiting to hear what the minister is saying tomorrow,” Barker added. “The key question is whatever a written ministerial statement, it will not be on the face of the law, and trust is low.”
Wiki Foxcroft, the labor lawmaker, who left his position as a government lash over the Law on Welfare earlier this month, told the Guardian that Starmer’s concessions were not far away.
She said she did not decide how to vote on Tuesday, but wanted to see additional improvements in government plans, adding: “I hope we will actually start listening to people with disabilities and their organizations through the government.”
Luis Haig, one of the leading rebels in the paper, said he would now vote for the bill, adding that a “significant number of concessions” was made, but she insisted that the government had to learn from the crisis.
Starmer admitted to The Sunday Times that he had not received everything right and recognized his recent focus until the middle of last week of the Iran crisis, and the G7 and NATO summits.
He dismissed him as “Bologna” claims the office chief Morgan Mexeini – A special focus on the rebel anger for its handling of well -being reforms – was the real driving force behind government decision making.
Source link
