Sir Kir Starmer told his cabinet on Tuesday to look back with a “feeling of pride and achievement” at the first year of labor – but across the road to the lower house, his party was convulsed in disorder and recrimination.
Plans to reduce £ 5 billion from the spiral benefits of the UK, Bill lies in tattoos after a week -long labor riot, culminating in A. Last moment climbing From the starmer who tore his heart from what was supposed to be his draft law on prosperity.
“People need to understand that it is an honest mistake, it was not malicious,” one cabinet minister said before the vote. The draft law intended to save £ 5 billion can now end up with money.
Although the alleged welfare account brought its crucial second reading on Tuesday, the damage caused by the prime minister’s reputation and his key lieutenant, party unity and public finances is significant.
After the messy withdrawal last week failed to prevent the risk of a potential defeat at the Commons Hall, Starmer was forced to bow to his lawmakers. “Literally, what’s the point now?” He asked a lawmaker, looking at the remains of the law. “The whole thing is encouraged.”
Kemi Badenoch, a conservative leader, called it “capitulation” and it was difficult to find a lawmaker who disagrees. The game of wines on Tuesday night was already in favor, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves attracting a lot.
It was Reeves who insisted on £ 5 billion in saving prosperity to use public finances and was accused by labor lawmakers of trying to lead through reforms that would always be political sales.
Although there is a cross-party consensus on the need to step up in an increased well-being account, the idea of breaking through cuts that are equal to £ 5,000 from 1 million sick or disabled people will always create widespread anger at the level of herb.
Some pointed to the government’s fingers – the parliamentary conductors who are convinced that their MPs fifth – because they did not notice a rebellion that increased to 126 lawmakers last week.
But Starmer, attending another summit abroad in the Netherlands last week, was accused by several lawmakers for conducting the number 10 operations dangerously separated from parliamentary party and domestic problems.
“It was not the blams of the whip,” one labor lawmaker said. “Downing Street was warned, but they didn’t hear.”
Morgan McSnei, the head of the Starmer’s office, worked closely with Reeves to initially try to force the original reforms. “They were tough,” one labor lawmaker said.
An individual of labor close to the discussions said the high command of the labor believes that reducing well -being will be popular with working people, even if they were unique to many MPs.
“It’s not like the issue of paying winter fuel,” they said, referring to Reeves’ previous twist in which she agreed to facilitate public anger by restoring the benefits of millions of pensioners. “The public really cared about it.”
A Jugov poll in March revealed that 68 % of Britons believe the benefit system is needed against 18 %, which said it was not. About 53 % believe that the criteria for getting benefits are not strict enough, against 25 % that disagree.
But the public was greater support for the benefits of disability and essential Labor MPs were sprayed. The prospects for Starmer face a rebellion for over 100 lawmakers set an alarm that Ringvonate last week, and the concessions began.
Starmer’s biggest previous rebellion was 16 lawmakers who voted for reform planning, according to Phil Kowley, a professor of politics at Quinn Mary University of London.
The deal was cooked last Thursday to soften the package of payment reductions for personal independence and the health element of universal credit – reducing potential savings by 2.5 billion pounds – including to ensure that existing applicants are not affected by new eligibility rules.
Macseyni, the head of labor, flogs Sir Alan Campbell and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rainer oversaw the changes on the government, which satisfied some labor lawmakers, but left many who still want more.
Labor lawmakers Dame Meg Hilier, Helen Chase and Debbie Abrahams were in talks on the “rebel” side, although a normal loyal lawmaker did not like that phrase. “The fact that I need to be part of the” rebel alliance “shows how wrong the government is.”
Liz Kendall, secretary of work and pensions, has reduced the increasingly neglected figure as he tries to sell reforms. “She looks like she’s tormented,” Badenoch told Commons on Tuesday.
But labor lawmakers have admitted that it is Reeves to pursue politics. “The message was confused,” one minister said. “It seemed to have been fiscal reasons, rather than repairing a broken system that puts people on the benefits.”
A labor official added that Reeves had received “most of the footsteps” of his colleagues, claiming that Kendall’s ministers privately say the reductions were forced by the Ministry of Finance.
Badenoch claims that the Law on Welfare is “rush for Rachel”, and senior government insiders have admitted that the chancellor insisted on the hastily prepared well -being to use his fiscal position in a statement in March.
By Tuesday night, calls for the chancellor’s dismissal were muted. But by the volume of the debacle there were signs that could change. “Rachel must be toast after this,” one labor lawmaker said.
Starmer, according to the prime minister’s allies, remains a fully supporter of Reeves. “Rachel is the one that should do the hard work,” one colleague said.
A well -linked labor lawmaker said Reeves opposed the decision last week to bring a £ 2.5 billion concession to the rebels, fearing that it would simply lead to return for more before the vote on Tuesday. “It was a Starmer decision,” the MP said.
MexeiniAn abrasive political operator with “Knux” bruises from his battles with the hard left of the paper also faces criticism, although the prime minister on Tuesday told his cabinet that the briefing against him had to stop.
After all, it’s a Starmer, which marks its first anniversary in Downing Street on Friday, which carries the can.
His authority has been stabbed, the Ming’s vase of party discipline lies shaken, and the prospect of further reforms in the prosperity of this government are seriously undermined.
Meanwhile, Reeves is left with potential Fistical fiscal hole of £ 5 billion Economists say she can force her to make her politically indelible in the fall: to raise the UK taxes again.
Source link
