Unlock the editor’s digestion for free
Rula Calaf, FT editor, chooses his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
Through the fog blamed on global markets during the second arrival of US President Donald Trump, the form begins to shape. If you argue, you can only review how Europe can cause a challenge for the dollar’s centralism in global funding and what the reform of its separated government bond markets looks like.
This will be a long, stenteline, at times the elevating process. After all, it’s Europe. But the question of whether to give the euro and make it more suitable for global official reserves is over. The answer is yes. Now it comes like.
One possible answer is not to do anything. The eurozone can use its imperfections in its favor. Instead of offering a huge unified government connection Supported by every member and spending of feeding in each country, one can adhere to what it already has: a loose collection of national bond markets of different sizes, flavors and externally assessed measures for their safety. Some big investors like that variety, and it is possible to sell as a virtue to state managers of huge pools around the world.
But “maybe” is making serious heavy lifting there. This attitude has its merits, but the Eurocrats than most flavors, and EU bankers generally make more efforts in thinking about how to better join forces and to challenge the significantly larger, slimmer, faster market of government bonds. This is a very clear live debate.
“We have this constant discussion of joint borrowing,” said Michael Claus, a German ambassador to the EU at the Financial Times event in Berlin this month. “There has never been a meeting (to EU government officials) that I remember in the last 12 months or so, without mentioning either Euro -binders or giving ideas for joint borrowing,” he added – how to impose on how this is not only Trump’s response, but also a broader debate on how to finance the European defense.
After all, this will be a political decision. But the drum for support for Europe to make its move here is growing louder, including European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, who wrote this month Moment of “Global Euro”. In part, as Lagarde stated, which rests on Europe’s already important role in global trade and the use of the euro as invoicing the currency – the role to continue to build.
This is often overlooked, but very important, as an even greater function of the dollar as a global invoiced currency goes hand in hand with its strong part of global reserves. “It is not just an administrative decision” to raise the reserve away from dollars, said Temus Fiotakis, a Barclay currency analyst in a briefing this week. “It’s not” Oh, I’m crazy about President Trump, I’ll take revenge with the purchase of euros. ” Instead, he said this follows a “antique recipe” to save on rainy days to ensure liquidity to keep trade flowing in crisis. Then, logically, greater trade in euros outside Europe would feed a stronger case for more euro reserves.
However, again, we are returning to where those reserves go and what can be the dominant eurozone. On that issue, ECB’s chief economist, Philip Lane, this month drew visible attention to the “Red Relationship/Blue” framework for the first time sketched in 2010.
This would include Euro member states, which ring revenue and using it to service the usual “blue” bonds whose revenue will be used to buy a piece of national “red” bonds.
The idea did not get off the field in 2010 for lack of political support and for good reason. At that time, you can drive a bus through the gaps between the costs of lending to safer Euro-constituent benchmarks and Germany-and-and-and-up foot-and-those footballs such as Italy, to say nothing about states in full-blown solvency crises. Given those spreads, why should Germany register at irrationally high costs? It was hard enough to keep Greece in the eurozone without adding another layer of probable dispute.
Now, now, the spreads have Everyone, but disappeared. As Lane says, the euro’s “financial architecture” is much stronger, its banking system is better capitalized, varied imbalances are sung. That is, it continues, “the structural changes in the design of the eurozone bond market will encourage stronger global demand for secure funds denominated in the euro.”
Some bankers sniff that the banking union in Europe is imperfect, its union in capital markets is a law, insolvency laws remain incompatible from one country to another, and the United States is only functioning. It’s all true, but the idea of ”blue” bonds – trumpet and heavyweight finances Olivier Blanchar and Angel Killad in A. Paper for the Peterson Institute – At least it gives the opportunity not to allow perfection to be an enemy of good.
Blue bonds may not end where all this has landed. But in one way or another, time is right for European politicians to understand this nettle. It is noticeable that the discussion moved from admiring the problem of breaking Europe under its weight, to understand how to fix it.
Source link